Improving how we manage sepsis

NCAS • Jul 29, 2018

Arjun Rajkhowa


(Published in Pursuit, University of Melbourne)


You might know a family member or friend who arrived at hospital with the flu, a headache or a chest infection - whose condition took a sudden downward turn due to sepsis or septic shock.


Patients who develop sepsis can deteriorate rapidly and interventions that help clinicians recognise sepsis and expedite patient care can make a significant difference.


A newly published study by University of Melbourne and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre clinician-researchers, led by Professor Karin Thursky, has found that a standardised sepsis pathway facilitating early sepsis recognition and prompt treatment in a cancer hospital is delivering significant benefits and saving lives.


Improvements include:


  • Earlier diagnosis
  • Faster initiation of antibiotic therapy (55 minutes vs 110 minutes)
  • Increased appropriateness of antibiotic therapy (90.1 per cent vs 76.1 per cent)
  • Reduced ICU admissions (17.1 per cent vs 35.5 per cent)
  • Reduced post-sepsis length of stay (7.5 days vs 9.9 days)
  • Lower sepsis-related mortality (5.0 per cent vs. 16.2 per cent)
  • Lower hospital admission costs (cost savings of $8,363 per patient)


Sepsis in hospitals


Sepsis is a life-threatening complication of an infection – an underlying infection triggers inflammatory responses throughout the body. If the patient doesn’t receive prompt and optimal treatment, it can lead to organ-failure and possibly death.


In 2016-17 in Victoria, Australia, 28,872 patients were diagnosed with sepsis and 3,258 of these patients died, representing a mortality rate of 11 per cent. Sepsis accounts for a significant proportion of intensive care unit admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the international literature indicates that a high proportion of in-hospital mortality can be attributed to sepsis.


The risk of developing sepsis also increases with age, posing a threat to care of the elderly.


Infections and sepsis are commonly encountered in cancer management as patients with weakened immune systems, including those undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy, are more vulnerable. Control of infections is critical to cancer survival.


Signs of sepsis


The early signs of sepsis may be a combination of high or low temperature, elevated heart rate, elevated breathing rate and high or low white blood cell count. Recognising these signs requires knowledge and vigilance by nursing and medical staff.


During severe sepsis, the patient may experience confusion or an altered mental state, decreased urination, low platelet count, low temperature and chills, extreme weakness and unconsciousness.


Septic shock or advanced sepsis is accompanied by a significant drop in blood pressure despite resuscitation with fluids and usually requires intensive care management.


Clinicians and nursing staff need to recognise the signs of sepsis and initiate treatment quickly. But time constraints and competing priorities mean this may not always happen efficiently in hospitals, resulting in clinical deterioration, increased ICU admissions and higher mortality.


A sepsis pathway


Clinicians at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre developed and implemented a whole-of-hospital sepsis pathway. Adapted from the New South Wales Clinical Excellence Commission’s Sepsis Kills pathway for emergency departments, the hospital’s pathway focused on timely and appropriate recognition, resuscitation and referral of patients with sepsis (drawing on the core principles that underpin all international sepsis management guidelines).


The sepsis pathway prioritises six actions of initial sepsis management in the first hour: oxygen administration; the taking of two sets of blood cultures; testing of venous blood lactate levels; administration of rapid fluid resuscitation and appropriate antibiotic treatment.


Prior to implementation, staff across different hospital wards received standardised training to avoid any inconsistencies in care delivery. This training and education is ongoing.


A key aspect of the pathway is the inclusion of a checklist of signs and symptoms at the point of care, enabling nurses to initiate the pathway prior to medical review.


This process saves valuable time and ensures nurses caring for patients can start critical pre-antibiotic treatment activities such as oxygen administration and cannulation, and take blood cultures and order a lactate test prior to the doctor’s arrival.


Serum lactate levels are important as they can help determine illness severity and prognosis. After the doctor’s arrival and confirmation of the diagnosis, fluid resuscitation and antibiotic treatment are initiated.


The pathway also provides different empiric first-dose antibiotic options based on suspected sites of infection, while also accounting for complications such as allergies and immune suppression.


During the study period, this helped medical staff to quickly process antibiotic initiation decisions and contributed to increased appropriateness of treatment.


Timing is key in sepsis management.


Intensive monitoring and quick delivery of oxygen can help resuscitate the patient, but the benefits of early interventions decrease with delays.


By streamlining what nurses can do at the point of care, this pathway facilitated quicker initiation of pre-antibiotic treatment activities – quicker testing and initial responses. Then, by streamlining consensus-based antibiotic treatment options, the pathway helped clinicians prescribe the initial antibiotic course, reducing time-to-antibiotics.


Scaling up the sepsis pathway project


Lead author Professor Karin Thursky, who led the clinicians responsible for the sepsis pathway project at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, also led a sepsis pathway project at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, in which the existing pathway was adapted and appropriately modified for a general hospital setting.


Her team has since received a grant from Better Care Victoria (Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria) to lead a state-wide implementation of the modified sepsis pathway, working with 11 hospitals and health services across Victoria.


“The delay in management of sepsis is what leads to serious negative outcomes for the patient. Timeliness of management of sepsis is absolutely critical. Early recognition has been demonstrated to reduce deaths, reduce length of stay in hospital and reduce admissions to the intensive care unit,” says Professor Thursky.


Kelly Sykes, project lead for the state-wide sepsis improvement project, highlights the importance of standardising care.


“Hospitals might find variations in how sepsis is recognised and managed across different wards in their facility. They need to consider that this variability poses a potential risk to patients,” she says.


Dr Douglas Travis, chair of Better Care Victoria, says the state-wide sepsis collaborative project aims to spread the benefits of quality improvement.


“Our hospitals do very good things but their achievements tend to stay in the one hospital. The aim of Better Care Victoria is to take good ideas and spread them to other places in Victoria so that the whole of the population can benefit from the good ideas that are generated in our public and private hospitals.”

by NCAS 03 Sept, 2022
Nurses: an underused, vital asset against drug-resistant infections Enrique Castro-Sánchez, Jo Bosanquet, Molly Courtenay, Rose Gallagher, Fiona Gotterson, Elizabeth Manias, Jo McEwen, Val Ness, Rita Olans, Maria Clara Padoveze, Briette du Toit & Miquel Bennasar-Veny Read the correspondence here , in response to Murray, C. et al Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis, also published in The Lancet (found here ). Citation : Castro-Sánchez, E., Bosanquet, J., Courtenay, M., Gallagher, R., Gotterson, F., Manias, E., ... & Bennasar-Veny, M. (2022). Nurses: an underused, vital asset against drug-resistant infections. The Lancet, 400(10354), 729. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01531-8
by NCAS 27 Aug, 2022
A novel GPPAS model: Guiding the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in primary care utilising collaboration between general practitioners and community pharmacists Sajal K Saha, Karin Thursky, David C.M. Kong and Danielle Mazza Abstract Interprofessional collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) is central to implement antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes in primary care. This study aimed to design a GP/pharmacist antimicrobial stewardship (GPPAS) model for primary care in Australia. An exploratory study design was followed that included seven studies conducted from 2017 to 2021 for the development of the GPPAS model. We generated secondary and primary evidence through a systematic review, a scoping review, a rapid review, nationwide surveys of Australian GPs and CPs including qualitative components, and a pilot study of a GPPAS submodel. All study evidence was synthesised, reviewed, merged, and triangulated to design the prototype GPPAS model using a Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety theoretical framework. The secondary evidence provided effective GPPAS interventions, and the primary evidence identified GP/CP interprofessional issues, challenges, and future needs for implementing GPPAS interventions. The framework of the GPPAS model informed five GPPAS implementation submodels to foster implementation of AMS education program, antimicrobial audits, diagnostic stewardship, delayed prescribing, and routine review of antimicrobial prescriptions, through improved GP–CP collaboration. The GPPAS model could be used globally as a guide for GPs and CPs to collaboratively optimise antimicrobial use in primary care. Implementation studies on the GPPAS model and submodels are required to integrate the GPPAS model into GP/pharmacist interprofessional care models in Australia for improving AMS in routine primary care. Read the full paper here . Citation : Saha, S. K., Thursky, K., Kong, D., & Mazza, D. (2022). A Novel GPPAS Model: Guiding the Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Primary Care Utilising Collaboration between General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists. Antibiotics, 11(9), 1158. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091158
by NCAS 18 Aug, 2022
Influences on nurses’ engagement in antimicrobial stewardship behaviours: A multi-country survey using the Theoretical Domains Framework Angel Marie Chater, Hannah Family, Ligia Maria Abraao, Emma Burnett, Enrique Castro-Sanchez, Briëtte Du Toit, Rose Gallagher, Fiona Gotterson, Elizabeth Manias, Jo Mcewen, Rosely Moralez de Figueiredo, Martina Nathan, Val Ness, Rita Olans, Maria Clara Padoveze & Molly Courtenay Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is significantly affected by inappropriate antibiotic use, and is one of the greatest threats to human health. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is a programme of actions promoting responsible antimicrobial use, and is essential for limiting AMR. Nurses have an important role to play in this context. Aim This study investigated the determinants of nurse AMS behaviours and the impact of past training. Method A cross-sectional multi-country survey design with mixed methods was employed. Participants were 262 nurses (223 female; mean age = 44.45; SD = 10.77 years) from ten nationalities, with individual survey links sent via professional networks in 5 countries, alongside Twitter. Nine AMS behaviours and 14 behavioural determinants were quantitatively assessed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and mapped to the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation – Behaviour) model. Analysis identified differences between nurses with and without AMS training. The influence of COVID-19 on AMS behaviour was qualitatively investigated using free text data. Findings Nurses performed all nine AMS behaviours, which were significantly higher (t(238) = -4.14, p < .001), by those who had training (M = 53.15; SD = 7.40) compared to those who had not (M = 48.30; SD = 10.75). Those with AMS training scored significantly higher in all of the TDF domains. The TDF was able to explain 27% of the variance in behaviour, with ‘Skills’ and ‘Behavioural Regulation’ (e.g. ability to self-monitor and plan), shown to be the most predictive of AMS actions. Both of these domains are situated in the Capability construct of COM-B, which can be enhanced with the intervention strategies of education and training. An increase in AMS behaviours was reported since COVID-19, regardless of previous training. Six core themes were linked to AMS: 1) Infection prevention and control, 2) Antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance, 3) The diagnosis of infection and the use of antibiotics, 4) Antimicrobial prescribing practice, 5) Person-centred care, and 6) Interprofessional collaborative practice. Conclusion This research, has identified the significant benefit of nurse training on AMS behaviour, and its determinants. Those who had training, scored higher in all TDF determinants of behaviour, compared to those who had had no training, resulting in higher Capability, Opportunity and Motivation to perform AMS behaviours. AMS education and training should be offered to nurses to enhance these factors. Future research should consider the optimal level of training to optimise AMS behaviour, with a focus on developing skills and behavioural regulation. Read the full paper here . Citation : Chater, A. M., Family, H., Abraao, L. M., Burnett, E., Castro-Sanchez, E., Du Toit, B., Gallagher, R., Gotterson, F. ... & Courtenay, M. (2022). Influences on nurses’ engagement in antimicrobial stewardship behaviours: A multi-country survey using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2022 July. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.07.010
by NCAS 17 Aug, 2022
Prophylactic antimicrobial prescribing in Australian residential aged-care facilities: Improvement is required
by NCAS 07 Aug, 2022
Improving management of urinary tract infections in residential aged care facilities Lyn-Li Lim, Noleen Bennett Abstract Antimicrobial resistance rates are higher in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) than other community or hospital settings. This is driven by antibiotic overuse and misuse. Urinary tract infection (UTI) is consistently the most common infection treated with antibiotics in Australian RACFs. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of how general practitioners (GPs) can support appropriate UTI management in RACFs following antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) principles. GPs are well placed to improve UTI management in RACFs. In this article, criteria for suspected, proven, recurrent and relapsed UTI are outlined, in addition to key AMS practices for the assessment, prevention, treatment and review of UTIs. Included are recommendations for the judicious use of urine dipstick testing, a widespread and longstanding practice in RACFs, and first-line empirical antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTIs. Read the full paper here . Citation: Lim, L. L., & Bennett, N. (2022). Improving management of urinary tract infections in residential aged care facilities. Australian journal of general practice, 51(8), 551-557. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31128/AJGP-05-22-6413 .
by NCAS 30 Jan, 2022
Opportunities for nurse involvement in surgical antimicrobial stewardship strategies: A qualitative study Courtney Ierano, Arjun Rajkhowa, Fiona Gotterson, Caroline Marshall, Trisha Peel, Darshini Ayton, Karin Thursky Abstract Background Multi-disciplinary antimicrobial stewardship teams are a common strategy employed to optimise antimicrobial prescribing. Nurses play a pivotal role in patient care and safety; however, their role and potential opportunities across surgical antimicrobial stewardship are not well-established. This study aims to highlight health professional perspectives of the nurse's role and relevant opportunities for nurses to engage in and lead surgical antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Methods An exploratory, multi-site, collective qualitative case study. Transcribed audio-recordings of focus groups with health professionals underwent thematic analysis, with mapping to established frameworks. Results Four key themes were identified; surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis is not prioritised for quality improvement, but nurses perceive benefits from surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis education and training; professional hierarchy hinders nurse engagement and leadership in antimicrobial stewardship; nurses are consistently engaged with patient care throughout the surgical journey; and clarity of roles and accountability for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis review and follow-up can bolster quality improvement initiatives. Discussion Many opportunities exist for nurse engagement in surgical antimicrobial stewardship. Identification of barriers and enablers support theoretically informed strategies i.e., education and guideline accessibility; multidisciplinary collaborations; executive support for nursing capacity building and the standardisation of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis workflow and documentation. Conclusions Nurses are critical to patient safety and to supporting antimicrobial stewardship, in the operating theatre, and throughout the patient's surgical journey. Applying theoretical frameworks to understand barriers and enablers to nurses’ contribution to antimicrobial stewardship has given insights to inform interventions to support nurse engagement. Tweetable abstract : Nurses are critical for patient safety. Many opportunities exist to support them as surgical antimicrobial stewards. Read the full paper here . Citation : Ierano, C., Rajkhowa, A., Gotterson, F., Marshall, C., Peel, T., Ayton, D., & Thursky, K. (2022). Opportunities for nurse involvement in surgical antimicrobial stewardship strategies: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 128, 104186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104186 .
by NCAS 30 Dec, 2021
Sajal K. Saha, David C.M. Kong, Danielle Mazza & Karin Thursky Abstract Introduction The establishment of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in primary care is central to substantially reduce the antimicrobial use and the associated risk of resistance. This perspective piece highlights the importance of systems thinking to set up and facilitate AMS programs in primary care. Areas covered The challenges that primary care faces to incorporate AMS programmes is multifactorial: an implementation framework, relevant resources, team composition, and system structures remain under-researched, and these issues are often overlooked and/or neglected in most parts of the world. Progress in the field remains slow in developed countries but potentially limited in low- and middle-income countries. Expert opinion The key AMS strategies to optimize antimicrobial use in primary care are increasingly known; however, health system components that impact effective implementation of AMS programs remain unclear. We highlight the importance of systems thinking to identify and understand the resource arrangements, system structures, dynamic system behaviors, and intra- and interprofessional connections to optimally design and implement AMS programs in primary care. An AMS systems thinking systemigram (i.e. a visual representation of overall architecture of a system) could be a useful tool to foster AMS implementation in primary care. Read the full paper here .  Citation : Saha, S. K., Kong, D. C. M., Mazza, D., & Thursky, K. (2022). A systems thinking approach for antimicrobial stewardship in primary care. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 20(6), 819-827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2022.2023010 .
by NCAS 22 Dec, 2021
Anna Khanina, Shio Yen Tio, Michelle R. Ananda-Rajah, Sarah E. Kidd, Eloise Williams, Lynette Chee, Karen Urbancic, Karin A. Thursky and Australasian Antifungal Guidelines Steering Committee  Abstract Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) are serious infections associated with high mortality, particularly in immunocompromised patients. The prescribing of antifungal agents to prevent and treat IFD is associated with substantial economic burden on the health system, high rates of adverse drug reactions, significant drug–drug interactions and the emergence of antifungal resistance. As the population at risk of IFD continues to grow due to the increased burden of cancer and related factors, the need for hospitals to employ antifungal stewardship (AFS) programmes and measures to monitor and prevent infection has become increasingly important. These guidelines outline the essential components, key interventions and metrics, which can help guide implementation of an AFS programme in order to optimise antifungal prescribing and IFD management. Specific recommendations are provided for quality processes for the prevention of IFD in the setting of outbreaks, during hospital building works, and in the context of Candida auris infection. Recommendations are detailed for the implementation of IFD surveillance to enhance detection of outbreaks, evaluate infection prevention and prophylaxis interventions and to allow benchmarking between hospitals. Areas in which information is still lacking and further research is required are also highlighted. Read the full paper here . Citation : Khanina, A., Tio, S. Y., Ananda-Rajah, M. R., Kidd, S. E., Williams, E., Chee, L., Urbancic, K., Thursky, K. A., & Australasian Antifungal Guidelines Steering, C. (2021, 2021/11/01). Consensus guidelines for antifungal stewardship, surveillance and infection prevention, 2021. Internal Medicine Journal, 51 (S7), 18-36. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.15586 .
by NCAS 22 Nov, 2021
Antimicrobial Awareness Week 2021 - webinar ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP IN AGED CARE Chair: A/Prof. Noleen Bennett (NCAS & VICNISS, Melbourne Health) Quality use of antimicrobials in residential aged care services: An update from the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission Dr. Lyn-li Lim (Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission) Basic principles of antimicrobial use Ms. Xin Fang (NCAS, Melbourne Health) The Royal Commission into Aged Care and the implications for AMS Dr. Janet Sluggett (Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute) National Infection Surveillance Program for Aged Care (NISPAC) A/Prof. Leon Worth (VICNISS, Melbourne Health) Preliminary results: Barriers and enablers to the implementation of a national infection and antimicrobial surveillance system Ms. Eliza Watson (NISPAC, Melbourne Health) Recommended resources for IPC and AMS A/Prof. Noleen Bennett (NCAS & VICNISS, Melbourne Health)
by NCAS 19 Nov, 2021
Antimicrobial Awareness Week 2021 - webinar HOW TO USE DATA – SUCCESS STORIES, PITFALLS AND OPPORTUNITIES Chair: Prof. Karin Thursky (NCAS, Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne) Optimising audit and feedback: recent evidence from implementation research Prof. Jill Francis (School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne) CASE STUDIES How to optimise antimicrobial allergy documentation A/Prof. Jason Trubiano (Austin Hospital, Melbourne) How big is this problem? Quantifying paediatric infections using activity-based management data Dr. Brendan McMullan (Sydney Children's Hospital) An innovative AMS program for children in remote and regional areas: optimising antibiotic use through early intravenous-to-oral conversion Dr. Minyon Avent (State-wide AMS Program, Queensland Health) Repurposing disease surveillance to capture social drivers of AMR Dr. Teresa Wozniak (CSIRO) Applying big data to general practice: implementation of AMS Dr. Brian Hur (NCAS & APCAH, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne) Evaluating the implementation of a pilot quality improvement program to support appropriate antimicrobial prescribing in general practice Dr. Ruby Biezen (Department of General Practice & NCAS, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne) Embedding clinical trials in the electronic medical record to improve antibiotic use Dr. Coen Butters (John Hunter Children’s Hospital, Newcastle) Q&A The National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey and the Clinical Care Standards Dr. Rodney James (NCAS, Melbourne Health), Ms. Xin Fang (NCAS, Melbourne Health) and Ms. Fiona Doukas (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care)
Show more
Share by: